Brainstorming in
Groups is Less Effective
Our last post focused on brainstorming sessions, the most common idea generation technique organizations use. Researcher Leigh Thompson (among others) gives a scathing appraisal of the effectiveness of group brainstorming sessions.[2] A summary of studies show that conventional face-to-face brainstorming groups generate fewer ideas than the same number of members working individually.[3] The previous post detailed four creativity killing culprits to group brainstorming; downward social conformity, norm setting, conformity, and production blocking. These culprits cause group members to feel inhibitions, anxiety, self-presentational concerns, and to conform to each other’s ideas and rates of idea generation.[4] The net result is less ideas generated.[5] This is disastrous to innovation because the probability of have one truly excellent idea is predicted by the number of ideas generated.[6]
We Are Blind to the Ineffectiveness of Group Brainstorming
Our last post focused on brainstorming sessions, the most common idea generation technique organizations use. Researcher Leigh Thompson (among others) gives a scathing appraisal of the effectiveness of group brainstorming sessions.[2] A summary of studies show that conventional face-to-face brainstorming groups generate fewer ideas than the same number of members working individually.[3] The previous post detailed four creativity killing culprits to group brainstorming; downward social conformity, norm setting, conformity, and production blocking. These culprits cause group members to feel inhibitions, anxiety, self-presentational concerns, and to conform to each other’s ideas and rates of idea generation.[4] The net result is less ideas generated.[5] This is disastrous to innovation because the probability of have one truly excellent idea is predicted by the number of ideas generated.[6]
We Are Blind to the Ineffectiveness of Group Brainstorming
It gets even worse. Not only is brainstorming in groups
ineffective, it also gives group members the faulty perception of productivity.[7]
Thompson dubs this effect the faulty-performance illusion.[8]
Interactive brainstorming teams feel over-confident about their productivity; ironically,
even more so than the superior individual brainstormer.[9]
Strategies to
Improve Creativity in Group Brainstorming
Thompson synthesizes numerous strategies to improve creativity
in group brainstorming. These strategies are:[10]
- Diversifying the team
- Analogical Reasoning
- Brainwriting
- Nominal Group Technique
- Creating organizational memory
- Trained facilitators
- High benchmarks
- Membership change
- Electronic brainstorming
- Creating a playground
We will focus on three particular strategies; brainwriting, nominal
group technique, and using trained facilitators.
Brainwriting
Brainwriting is the process of group members writing down
their idea quietly during a brain-storming session.[11]
Nominal Group Technique
Nominal Group Technique is merely a method of brainwriting where
members start brainstorming sessions by first brainwriting, and then sharing
their ideas among the group.[12]
Trained Facilitators
A trained facilitator guides teams in their brainstorming
session. They are responsible for activities such as jotting down the ideas,
structuring the interactions, and encouraging active participation. Several
studies find that groups with actively participating trained facilitators
produce significantly more ideas that those without one.[13]
We will continue to discuss these and
other strategies for improving creativity in group brainstorming sessions.
[1] See
Generally, Michael G. Jacobides, Thorbjørn Knudsen, and Mie Augier, Benefiting From Innovation: Value Creation,
Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures, Research Policy 35.8 (2006),
1200-1221.
[2]
See Generally, Leigh Thompson, Improving
the Creativity of Organizational Work Groups, Academy of Management
Executive Vol. 17. No. 1 (2003).
[3]
Paul B. Paulus, Karen Van der Zee,
Should There be a Romance between Teams and Groups?, Journal of
Occupational Psychology Vol. 77 (2004), 476.
[4]
See Thompson, supra note 2, at 102.
[5] Id.
[6] See
Generally Paul B. Paulus, Nicholas W. Kohn, and Lauren E. Arditti, Effects of Quantity and Quality instructions
on Brainstorming, The Journal of Creative Behavior (2011).
[7] See
Thompson, supra note 2, at 102.
[8] Id.
[9]
See Paulus, supra note 3.
[10]
See Thompson, supra note 2, at 107
(table).
[11] Id. at 103.
[12] Id. at 104.
[13] Id. at 105.
No comments:
Post a Comment